2011 CityMatCH Conference Abstract Submission
New abstract submission deadline: Monday, April 11th, 2011.
NOTE: Before you begin the submission process, please read these instructions carefully, and prepare all required information.
INSTRUCTIONS
You will need to fill out the online abstract submission form AND, for each presenter, email three additional documents:
  1. Presenter curriculum vita or resume
  2. Download Form A - Disclosure
  3. Download Form B - Biographical Form
The online abstract submission process will require the following:
Presenter/Author, Release, Title, Mode

Presenter/Author Contact Information

    • Complete contact information is needed for the Primary Contact person, who will receive a confirmation e-mail and other communications.
    • Name and e-mail are needed for all other presenters and authors.

Responsibilities and Releases

    • You will need to review your responsibilities as a presenter and certify that CityMatCH can distribute your presentation and photographs.

    Presentation Title

Preferred Mode of Delivery

    • Oral: Oral sessions provide an opportunity for conference participants to hear the latest information from individual presenters on a variety of topics, usually grouped into themes. Oral session abstracts will be accepted individually and combined with other presentations into sessions, typically three per session.
    • Poster: Large bulletin boards are provided in a hall or large room. During a special session to highlight the posters, conference attendees have the opportunity to read posters as authors stand by to explain their projects.
    • Publication only: Those who do not wish to be considered for oral or poster sessions but still want their abstracts to be published in the conference abstract compendium should select this option.
    • Full Session: If you and two other colleagues have a great idea for a conference session, contact Laurin Kasehagen via e-mail at lkasehagen@unmc.edu and pitch your session proposal!
Abstract Content

Public Health Issue Focus Area(s)

    • Adverse perinatal outcomes
    • Children and youth with special health care needs
    • Chronic disease
    • Community collaboration
    • Environment/Place and health
    • Faith-based initiatives
    • Fathers and families
    • Health equity/Social justice
    • Immunization
    • Infectious disease
    • Justice
    • Mental health
    • Preconception health
    • Racial/ethnic disparities
    • Racism
    • Reproductive health/Family planning

Population Focus Area(s)

    • Infants
    • Children
    • Adolescents
    • Women
    • Men
    • Families
    • Life course
    • Intergenerational

   Abstract Type

  • Data Focus
    • Select a “Data Focus” if the abstract is focused on the analysis, interpretation, or utilization of qualitative or quantitative data (for scientific studies, research, planning, or evaluation). The abstract should include:
      • Background: Description of the public health problem that the study is intended to address, or the program or policy being evaluated. Include innovative aspects, and why the study is important.
      • Objectives: A clear statement of the research question, purpose, and expected outcomes.
      • Methods: Study design, source of data including methods of data collection, analytic methods, approach taken.
      • Results: Specific results in summary form, with appropriate statistical analysis and interpretation.
      • Limitations: Any known limitations of the study and its findings, such as potential bias and lack of generalizability.
      • Conclusions/Implications: The public health implications of the study findings, the conclusions.
  • Program/Policy Focus
    • Select a “Program/Policy Focus” if the abstract is focused on development, implementation, or dissemination of MCH initiatives (program, partnership, collaboration, or policies). The abstract should include:
      • Issue: The specific problem that the initiative was intended to address, including evidence that the initiative was needed.
      • Setting: Geographic location where the activities took place, and the intended audience or population expected to benefit from the activities.
      • Project: Description of the activities, including evidence that these activities would be likely to effectively address the problem, innovative aspects, your organization’s role, logic model, and evaluation plan.
      • Accomplishments/Results: The major accomplishments, including evaluation results, i.e. evidence of the effectiveness of the initiative on knowledge, behaviors and/or outcomes in the target population.
      • Barriers: Summary of specific barriers encountered and how/whether they were overcome.
      • Lessons Learned: The take home message, what worked, what should be done differently, and the implications for public health.

Abstract Body (instructions)

    • Abstract text may not exceed 500 words.
    • Prepare the abstract and save it in your computer before accessing the on-line abstract submission form.
    • Define abbreviations and acronyms.
    • Use numerals to indicate numbers, except at the beginning of a sentence.
    • Describe your results. Do NOT simply state that the results will be discussed.
    • Do not include tables or figures in the abstract. Abstracts will be reproduced as submitted. The conference organizers reserve the right to reject abstracts for publication in the conference abstract compendium if they do not comply with the guidelines / instructions.

Information for Replication (optional)

    • Approximate annual budget / costs to replicate program / activity
    • Resources used to cover the costs
    • Key partners / stakeholders who collaborated on the program / activity
Abstract Scoring Criteria
All submitted abstracts will be reviewed by a panel of experts according to the following criteria.

Data Focus

Abstract Content
2
The author included the recommended elements (Background, Objectives, Methods, Results, Limitations, Conclusions/Implications)
Abstract Clarity
2
The ideas were developed, the concepts communicated, and the findings presented clearly and in sufficient detail to understand what was done.
Innovation
4
The study introduces a new idea, method or approach, utilizes a new data source, or applies old methods or data sources in a new setting or application.
Conception
4
The need for the study was demonstrated, and the study design and data source were appropriate for meeting the study objectives.
Execution
4
Analytic methods were appropriate, and analysis was carried out correctly. The authors noted important limitations and drew reasonable conclusions.
Impact
4
The results and conclusions will have the potential to influence MCH practice.

Program/Policy Focus

Abstract Content
2
The author included the recommended elements
(Issue, Setting, Project, Accomplishments/Results, Barriers, Lessons Learned).
Abstract Quality
2
The ideas were developed, the concepts communicated, and the findings presented clearly and in sufficient detail to understand what was done.
Innovation
4
The initiative introduces a new idea, method or approach to an MCH issue, uses resources in new ways, or uses old methods in a new setting.
Grounded in Evidence
4
Evidence was provided that issue or problem was important. The initiative was evidence-based, or some evidence was presented that it was likely to be effective in addressing this problem.
Evaluation
4
The initiative’s evaluation plan was described. The evaluation addressed knowledge, behaviors and/or outcomes of target populations (not just program activities).
Effective
4
The initiative appears or “promises” to be effective and replicable OR it produced lessons that can be valuable in creating more effective programs and policies.
Questions about Abstracts
Please contact Carol Gilbert (cgilbert@unmc.edu) at CityMatCH (402)561-7500.
THREE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS NEEDED FOR EACH PRESENTER

After you submit your form, you will need to email three additional documents for each presenter.  Your abstract submission is NOT complete until CityMatCH has received these documents, which are required to offer FREE continuing education credits to conference attendees. The documents are:

  • Presenter curriculum vita or resumé.
  • FORM A: DISCLOSURE FORM – Please certify that the presenter has no relevant financial relationships with commercial interests, or disclose those interests if they do exist.
  • FORM B: BIOGRAPHICAL FORM – Please provide relevant academic degrees, institutions, and the year(s) received, along with other qualifications relevant to this presentation.

Download Forms A and B here, at the top of this page, or on the e-mailed confirmation you receive from CityMatCH after you SUBMIT the abstract. Then fill out the forms for each presenter, save them, and email the two forms and the curriculum vita or resumé as attached WORD documents to Marilyn Ingram at moingram@unmc.edu.